[Dnsmasq-discuss] URIBL_BLOCKED with dnsmasq and server options

[ngtech1ltd at gmail.com]

If you really want something out of the RFC range just use:
10053
 
Eliezer
 
----
Eliezer Croitoru
NgTech, Tech Support
Mobile: +972-5-28704261
Email: ngtech1ltd at gmail.com <mailto:ngtech1ltd at gmail.com> 
Web: https://ngtech.co.il/
My-Tube: https://tube.ngtech.co.il/
 
From: Dnsmasq-discuss <dnsmasq-discuss-bounces at lists.thekelleys.org.uk> On Behalf Of Eric Fahlgren
Sent: Tuesday, 30 August 2022 23:05
To: Jelle de Jong <jelledejong at powercraft.nl>
Cc: dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] URIBL_BLOCKED with dnsmasq and server options
 
 
 
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 12:27 PM Jelle de Jong <jelledejong at powercraft.nl <mailto:jelledejong at powercraft.nl> > wrote:
So I setup dnsmasq with only one server:

server=127.0.0.1#533

and ran unbound with the following config:

server:
port: 533
...  
What would be a better port then 533 for a localhost only DNS service... 
is there something like 8080 for DNS just 5353 is mdns. What do people use?
 
533 looks good to me...  The IANA assigns it for use by "netwall for emergency broadcasts", which I've never heard of, so I'd just leave it there.
 
5353 is probably ok, a lot of people use it, but if you want run avahi (linux) or Bonjour (mac) on your host, you might have some issues.  I just avoid it on principal, when I installed avahi on my home ubuntu server that bit me, so I don't want to deal with that again.
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/attachments/20220901/3df11261/attachment-0001.htm>