[Dnsmasq-discuss] Confusion about "no address range available for DHCPv6 request via ..."
Daniel Farina
daniel at fdr.io
Wed Apr 19 20:05:23 UTC 2023
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 1:02 PM Daniel Farina <daniel at fdr.io> wrote:
>
> I thought about using the constructor feature, but I was trying to figure
> out if there was some way to get dnsmasq to respond to the DHCP query
> without occupying space in the /64...
>
Editorial error: I meant the /80. the only /64 involved is on the virtual
machine host.It should read:
I thought about using the constructor feature, but I was trying to figure
out if there was some way to get dnsmasq to respond to the DHCP query
without occupying space in the /80 I'd like the VM to use (e.g. by
listening and responding to DHCP via link local addresses. In such a case
the address range would have to be telegraphed rather than read from the
interface. As seen in my example, one address suffices for the one VM that
is free to bind anything in the /80.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/attachments/20230419/154696b0/attachment.htm>
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss
mailing list