[Dnsmasq-discuss] my config, just do

[Geert Stappers]

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 04:53:19PM -0700, Wink Saville wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:33 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 05:27:28PM -0700, Wink Saville wrote:
> > >
> > > Also, I wonder if maybe there should be multiple dnsmasq.conf
> > > examples. Having one huge example seems overwhelming to the reader
> > > and also difficult for the maintainers.  Breaking the single large
> > > example into a set of simpler and more targeted examples might be
> > > better, thoughts?
> >
> > So true. Simon did also express that idea.
> >
> > This my config
> >
> >
> > alpaca:/etc
> > # grep -v ^\# /etc/dnsmasq.conf | grep -v ^$
> > no-resolv
> > server=127.0.0.1#35353

bind listens there


> > domain=gpm.stappers.nl
> > dhcp-range=172.24.0.40,172.24.0.47,15m
> > dhcp-option=option:router,172.24.0.1
> > dhcp-option=6,172.24.0.10
> > dhcp-option=option:ntp-server,172.24.0.9
> > dhcp-option=option:domain-search,gpm.stappers.nl,stappers.nl
> > enable-tftp
> > srv-host=_http._tcp.deb.debian.org,juli.gpm.stappers.nl,3142
> > log-queries
> > log-dhcp
> > conf-dir=/etc/dnsmasq.d/,*.conf
> > alpaca:/etc
> > #
> >
> >
> > Do note that I have no need for "tag".
> >
> 
> I agree they aren't used often, but they are a feature in the code that I'm
> using a certain way and I've provided some documentation for that use case.
> 
> But, maybe my use case is improper and shouldn't be documented. If
> that is the case then I suggest the code should be changed to detect
> "multiple dhcp-options with the same tag" as an error. I'll volunteer to
> try to do that, if that is the consensus.

Just do



Groeten
Geert Stappers

P.S.
Translation of "Just do":  In the world of libre software there is no
need to ask for permission on what to build or what to improve.
And even with "permission" is there no garantee that others accept
what was build / improved.
-- 
Silence is hard to parse