[Dnsmasq-discuss] v2.91test1 compile failure on FreeBSD

[Simon Kelley]

On 29/12/2024 23:04, Matthias Andree via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
>
> I think the previous RR_IMDATALEN expression is fine as long as you
> #include <stddef.h> before its first use, and as along as you won't coin
> your own version of offsetof, of which I don't know a
> conforming/portable way.
> 

dnsmasq.h ~includes <stddef.h>, so no problem there.

> The next thing you'll be missing is a _Static_assert to ensure
> sizeof(data) <= 16.  Which isn't C99. :-)

I need a policy on supported C standards then :)
> 
> Could you also push the v2.91test3 tag to the public Git? Its HEAD is at
> 7c348a0, there is also a test3 tarball, but no Git tag, and my patches
> still apply on top of it, so it's older, my guess is 3ac11cd.
> 

I don't know what happened there.  The 2.91test3 tarball includes a 
commit and tag which aren't in the public repo, but the tarball is 
generated from a trigger when the public repo is updated. Unfortunately 
the local tree I pushed to do this is on a machine which is 350km away 
from me and switched off.

I've reapplied the missing patch from the tarball and tagged v2.91test4, 
to avoid inconsistencies.

Cheers,

Simon.



> Thanks in adavance.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
> Dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss