[Dnsmasq-discuss] Three v2.92test8 findings (one regression from d1008215 made 2025 May 14)

[Matthias Andree]

Geert,   (and anyone but Geert and Simon may not want to read this)

you have massively overstepped your competence and also any acceptable 
form here.

What does it take for you to stop disgracing yourself?


> The (poorly presented) patch has been seen.  And this (poor) email should
> be recieved as an invite for a next attempt.


You are quite obviously not in a position to assess anyone's contributions.
First and foremost because you're not the maintainer,
and then because the form quoted above clearly shows you lack any 
technical and social skills of reviewing anybody else's contributions, 
patch or not.

Simon's response to my patch and every finding I presented in the 
mailing was concise, polite, technical, to the point. That, and his 
releasing v2.92test9 proved your defamation quoted above quite wrong, 
quite obviously.


I request that you, Geert Stappers, and services you operate or persons 
or services associated with you henceforth (1) do not react to my 
contributions, (2) not quote or otherwise reproduce, in full or part, 
anything I provide, unless there is a by-case express written permission.


Respect and hence regards forfeited.