[Dnsmasq-discuss] Help Translating DNSMasq options for NetBoot Mac

richardvoigt at gmail.com richardvoigt at gmail.com
Tue Feb 2 07:49:18 GMT 2010


On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Don Muller <don at djmuller.com> wrote:
> I’ve never tried this so I have no idea what I’m talking about but are the
> values on these two lines supposed to be different in the highlighted spots?

Probably not.

But Max has great search engine placement for the variant spelling.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=APPLBSDPC


>
>
>
> dhcp-vendorclass=apple-boot,"APPLBSDPC/i386"
>
>
>
> dhcp-option-force=apple-boot,60,"AAPLBSDPC/i386"
>
> Don
>
>
>
> From: dnsmasq-discuss-bounces at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> [mailto:dnsmasq-discuss-bounces at lists.thekelleys.org.uk] On Behalf Of Max
> Turkewitz
> Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 11:23 PM
> To: Simon Kelley
> Cc: dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Help Translating DNSMasq options for NetBoot
> Mac
>
>
>
> Simon,
> Just tried it with 2.52, and the apple-boot configuration
> dhcp-vendorclass=apple-boot,"APPLBSDPC/i386"
> dhcp-option-force=apple-boot,43,08:04:81:00:00:67
> dhcp-option-force=apple-boot,60,"AAPLBSDPC/i386"
> dhcp-option-force=apple-boot,17,"nfs:192.168.33.1:/var/lib/tftpboot:Diag106NetBoot.nbi/NetBoot.dmg"
> dhcp-option-force=apple-boot,67,"Diag106NetBoot.nbi/i386/booter"
>
> It still doesn't seem to be matching the vendorclass:
> Feb  1 23:12:59 mightyjoeyoung dnsmasq-dhcp[31035]: 35917 Available DHCP
> range: 192.168.33.100 -- 192.168.33.149
> Feb  1 23:12:59 mightyjoeyoung dnsmasq-dhcp[31035]: 35917 Vendor class:
> AAPLBSDPC/i386/MacBook5,1
> Feb  1 23:12:59 mightyjoeyoung dnsmasq-dhcp[31035]: 35917 DHCPINFORM(eth0)
> 192.168.33.148 00:23:df:ab:6b:32
> Feb  1 23:12:59 mightyjoeyoung dnsmasq-dhcp[31035]: 35917 DHCPACK(eth0)
> 192.168.33.148 00:23:df:ab:6b:32
> Feb  1 23:12:59 mightyjoeyoung dnsmasq-dhcp[31035]: 35917 requested options:
> 43:vendor-encap, 60:vendor-class
> Feb  1 23:12:59 mightyjoeyoung dnsmasq-dhcp[31035]: 35917 tags: lan, eth0
> Feb  1 23:12:59 mightyjoeyoung dnsmasq-dhcp[31035]: 35917 next server:
> 192.168.33.1
> Feb  1 23:12:59 mightyjoeyoung dnsmasq-dhcp[31035]: 35917 sent size:  1
> option: 53:message-type  05
> Feb  1 23:12:59 mightyjoeyoung dnsmasq-dhcp[31035]: 35917 sent size:  4
> option: 54:server-identifier  192.168.33.1
> Feb  1 23:12:59 mightyjoeyoung dnsmasq-dhcp[31035]: 35917 sent size:  4
> option: 51:lease-time  00:01:51:6f
> Feb  1 23:12:59 mightyjoeyoung dnsmasq-dhcp[31035]: 35917 sent size:  4
> option:  1:netmask  255.255.255.0
> Feb  1 23:12:59 mightyjoeyoung dnsmasq-dhcp[31035]: 35917 sent size:  4
> option: 28:broadcast  192.168.33.255
> Feb  1 23:12:59 mightyjoeyoung dnsmasq-dhcp[31035]: 35917 sent size:  4
> option:208  241.0.116.126
>
> Any thoughts?  I could remove the quotes from the vendor class and try
> again.  Do I need to do anything special to indicate that APPLBSDPC/i386 is
> only the beginning of the vendor class?
>
> Thanks again,
>                   Max
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Max Turkewitz <max.turkewitz at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> The test server is running 2.50,  I can't tell what version DD-WRT has (it
> seems to be missing options or output from the application).  When I get
> home this evening I will download, compile, and test the latest DNSMasq.
>  I'll let you know how that goes.
>
> -Max
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Simon Kelley <simon at thekelleys.org.uk>
> wrote:
>
> Max Turkewitz wrote:
>
> (resending this because the list put it on hold due to its large size, so I
> hosted the files instead of attaching them)
>
>
>
> Ah, sorry, I didn't see this and OK'd the message this morning.
>
> First problem to solve is to work out which dnsmasq isn't setting the
> "apple-boot" tag. What version of dnsmasq are we talking about here, Max?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Simon.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
> Dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
>
>



More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list