[Dnsmasq-discuss] It works: multiple dnsmasqs running

[Vladislav Grishenko]

Refer patch attached (against current git)

Best Regards, Vladislav Grishenko


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vladislav Grishenko [mailto:themiron at mail.ru]
> Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2012 3:51 PM
> To: 'Gene Czarcinski'; 'dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk'
> Subject: RE: [Dnsmasq-discuss] It works: multiple dnsmasqs running
> 
> Hi Gene, Simon,
> 
> I'm using similar patch for a couple of months already.
> Works fine, hadn't time to send it here yet.
> 
> As for V6ONLY, with wildcarding and without this socket will listen for
IPv4
> messages too on 547 port, nut not sure v6-mapped addresses will pass
> checks there.
> Anyway, behavior is externally controlled by sysctl net.ipv6.bindv6only,
so,
> it's better to set the flag, just in case.
> 
> Best Regards, Vladislav Grishenko
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dnsmasq-discuss-bounces at lists.thekelleys.org.uk [mailto:dnsmasq-
> > discuss-bounces at lists.thekelleys.org.uk] On Behalf Of Gene Czarcinski
> > Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2012 1:45 AM
> > To: dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> > Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] It works: multiple dnsmasqs running
> >
> > On 10/13/2012 02:39 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> > > I still have the setting of IPV6_V6ONLY and I do not know if this is
> > > needed.  I will try and run some tests without it and see if it
> > > still works.
> > Tested: not needed.
> >
> > Gene
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
> > Dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> > http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Allow-multiple-dnsmasq-instances-and-fix-DHCPv6-sock.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2144 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/attachments/20121014/5a9b9b85/attachment.obj>