[Dnsmasq-discuss] Why dnsmasq got external DNS requests on one system and not another
Simon Kelley
simon at thekelleys.org.uk
Wed May 28 16:19:20 UTC 2014
On 27/05/14 11:14, Chris Green wrote:
> I think I have finally fathomed out why my new dnsmasq installation on
> my desktop machine didn't work whereas an apparently idetical setup on
> a small server did work.
>
> I *think* it's because Network Manager puts a file in /etc/dnsmasq.d
> that just has one directive in it:-
> bind-interfaces
> I believe this is left there from the 'dnsmasq run by Network Manager'
> mode which is the default on [x]ubuntu systems.
>
> On the small server (where everything did work OK) the bind-interfaces
> directive didn't really do much as eth0 was already up and running
> when dnsmasq started so dnsmasq would listen on eth0. However on my
> desktop machine, for whatever reason, eth0 takes a long time to start
> working (there are loads of messages about it in syslog at start-up
> time) and thus bind-interfaces stops dnsmasq from listening on eth0
> because it's not there when dnsmasq starts.
>
> I've fixed it on my desktop machine simply by removing the
> bind-interfaces directive. Now there are no 'listen-address' or
> 'interface' directives (as per the original setup) and without the
> bind-interfaces directive dnsmasq listens on everything, which is
> OK on my small home LAN.
>
> Does this make sense? I.e. is my understanding correct? ... and
> again is it worth adding to the FAQ if my diagnosis is correct, I
> guess an interface being late to start up isn't *that* rare an
> occurrence. Maybe just a note to say that one should remove the
> 'bind-interface' directive left there by Network Manager if installing
> a 'proper' dnsmasq.
>
One effect of "bind-interfaces" is exactly that dnsmasq only listens on
interfaces hat exist when it starts up, so that's enough to explain what
you saw. Well done for finding the problem.
Cheers,
Simon.
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss
mailing list