[Dnsmasq-discuss] How does DNSMASQ handle large concurrent configure file updating request requests
Yongkang You
yongkang.you at gmail.com
Thu Jan 22 03:50:19 GMT 2015
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Simon Kelley <simon at thekelleys.org.uk>
wrote:
> OK, the first problem: I didn't anticipate that you're using
> dhcp-optsfile, do there's no support for that in the code I checked
> in. That's easily fixed.
>
After release new binary, I would love to try.
>
> There's no support for addn-hosts either. You're including the
> hostname on the dhcp-host stanza, so the hosts file may be redundant,
> but it does allow the hostname to resolve in the DNS even if the host
> doesn't have a DHCP lease. If that why you're using the hosts file? If
>
We using leasefile-ro option in dnsmasq.conf. I am not sure if it means no
DHCP lease, although we still have to call 'dhcp_release', after removing a
VM's dns config. Is it a correct usage?
> so, I need to think about that a bit more.
>
But we do need that files, since there are some hostname bindings will only
appear in addn-hosts configs (and not in dhcp-host configs).
>
>
> Re: you second message. There's no logging for this, given we're
> trying to support lots of files, I didn't want to clog up the logs.
>
If there are some debug option I can use to test, I could easily figure out
if the new function works in my environment.
--
Yongkang You
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/attachments/20150122/17d2d991/attachment.html>
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss
mailing list