[Dnsmasq-discuss] can't get multiple domains to work

[Simon Kelley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

You can have multiple domains, but you need to associate subnets with
them, so dnsmasq can determine which one to use.


Cheers,

Simon.



On 21/02/17 03:35, Spike wrote:
> I didn't because it seemed wrong, generally speaking the last entry
> for a given keyword should override former if dups are allowed at
> all. In any case I just tried and that's what happened, with
> 
> domain=good domain=better
> 
> host.better started to resolve and host.good no longer resolved.
> 
> that said it's true that the most recent hit on the ML for
> "multiple domain" did mention a similar setup with two domain lines
> altho it had two diff ranges.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Spike
> 
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 6:55 PM richardvoigt at gmail.com 
> <mailto:richardvoigt at gmail.com> <richardvoigt at gmail.com 
> <mailto:richardvoigt at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> Have you tried using more than one domain= line?
> 
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Spike <spike at drba.org 
> <mailto:spike at drba.org>> wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> first time poster here so first things first, thanks to all of you
> that have worked on dnsmasq, all of us here have greatly benefited
> for years from this great piece of software.
> 
> Second, my google-fu and manpage reading are failing me and I can't
> seem to find a way to have dnsmasq resolve queries for multiple
> domains. I've found some posts from 2008 about introducing the
> feature and a recent one about multiple domains, but for different
> ranges.
> 
> What I'm dealing with is a change of domain, so right now 
> dnsmasq.conf has domain=good and eventually it will be 
> domain=better , but during the transition phase it would be useful
> if it could be domain=good,better so that queries for host.good and
> host.better resolve to the same dhcp-host definition.
> 
> is that possible? what's the actual syntax? The manual mentions 
> "domainS", plural, but not if there is a particular syntax to 
> specify them and comma does not work (for example for local it 
> specifically mentions /domain/domain/).
> 
> I guess the alternative if the above isn't possible would be to 
> allow any kind of domain to basically be ignored so that entries 
> are returned as long as the host path matches (this is just during
> the transition phase so it would be ok)
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Spike
> 
> _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss
> mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk 
> <mailto:Dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk> 
> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss
> mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk 
> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=t+QV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----