[Dnsmasq-discuss] Patch with option to filter A records
stappers at stappers.nl
Sat Jun 5 15:57:35 UTC 2021
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 05:37:25PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 03:34:59PM +0200, Trey Sis wrote:
> > Cheers,
> > Treysis
> > Patch:
> > >From bd22a36f76e35a0dc6c8be8996056318fec96e5e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: treysis <treysis at gmx.net>
> > Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2021 15:27:26 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] Add option to filter A record requests
> > ---
> > src/dnsmasq.h | 3 ++-
> > src/option.c | 3 +++
> > src/rfc1035.c | 11 +++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> That patch did not apply cleanly. With some manual work it did apply.
> Except to see the reworked version here soon.
:-) It should have arrived ...
> Hopefully is Author left intact. (I'm about to `git send-email` a patch
> that is not mine ).
looks good. @Simon: Please check with `git show` after the `git am`.
> And the original patch lacks update of the manual page,
> it is where I chip in.
That became https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2021q2/015110.html
> > Is there any chance
> > for such a patch to make it into official dnsmasq?
And increase that chance by doing a follow-up on this message.
Going from one in a biljion to one in a million
is a huge increase in chance.
I think mixing gambling and software development is here off-topic 8^)
Silence is hard to parse
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss