[Dnsmasq-discuss] change in behavior where v4 address exists but not v6 in 2.86
Todd Derr
salty at bandcamp.com
Tue Sep 21 04:14:45 UTC 2021
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 12:03 AM <simon at thekelleys.org.uk> wrote:
> In 2.86, there's a defined priority list for domains, so the behaviour
> you want is easy to define
>
> address=/dummy.com/127.0.0.2
> local=/dummy.com/
>
>
thanks, that works fine for our purposes.
also thanks for the explanation. I mentioned in another message that a
coworker was having some issue with 2.80; based on what you said I think
that was definitely something else but I think at this point I'll just
convince them to upgrade if they haven't already.
> Maybe better documentation is the solution?
>
The example above is really helpful and clear IMO, maybe sneak it in at the
end of --address?
thanks,
todd.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/attachments/20210921/756aef52/attachment.htm>
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss
mailing list