[Dnsmasq-discuss] How may is too many CNAME references?

Ercolino de Spiacico bellocarico at hotmail.com
Mon Sep 27 12:24:19 UTC 2021

Thank you for the answer.

In my case, since I'm compiling the adblock list via script that takes 
already care of the duplicates, this dnsmasq behaviour is redundant and 
actually unwanted because it causes issues.

Beside this, is there a specific reason why you force this check on 
CNAME only but not on A records? It seems inconsistent.

I would suggest to switch this off by default for cases like mine and 
perhaps design a new option to force the duplicates check if wanted only.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/attachments/20210927/34a11ff4/attachment.htm>

More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list